Shared from a friend’s page....
****Written by a Physician****
My FIL posted this- I recently gave him Dr. Humphries's book and Vaxxed, and yesterday, he recv'd Bought and Judy's book. Ok to share.
This is his post today-
“Chronicles of Senility. My daughter-in-law believes many common vaccines given to people are dangerous and cause serious disease in many of those who are vaccinated. As a physician, I can recall not one word of training about the negative effects of vaccines save for the possibility of anaphylaxis, an allergic reaction possible with all medicines. Certainly I was not taught that vaccines might cause death or long-term disability. The death rates for vaccines were not mentioned and possible associations with things like autism and various encephalopathies certainly were not taught.
I was taught that vaccines should be given to a majority of the population in order to induce herd immunity and cause as many infectious diseases as possible to just die out. I was taught that such efforts had almost eliminated polio and smallpox, for example. In the rush of medical school and the slave labor of residency I had no time to read more on the issue of vaccination. I accepted the standard line of the medical community: vaccines are good.
Like many "commonly accepted" beliefs, it turns out that vaccination, on further research, is both dangerous and probably quite ineffective in protecting the general population against many diseases. In short, my previous understanding was incorrect and ill informed.
Ask yourself, exactly where and from whom did they get the starting tissue or fluid that contains the virus or bacteria used to produce a vaccine? The vaccine manufacturer, if he acted like Jenner and the cowpox vaccine used against smallpox, took a sample of pus from an infected patient. Now, such samples can contain literally millions of different virus particles of millions of different virus species. We have no good estimate of how many virus species there are or where they reside. We do know that every species of animal and bird tested has its own little herds of virus species. Humans too. If you start with a feedstock that is contaminated, you cannot be sure what you end up with. It is literally impossible to filter out virus particles. Chemical purification cannot eliminate all unwanted live virus either - it runs up against the law of diminishing returns.
But suppose that your feedstock is pure (seldom a valid assumption and one which, sadly, is almost never properly tested by vaccine manufactuers) how can you avoid contamination of your product vaccine when you amplify the virus in order to have enough to provoke a protective immune response? The hurdles to overcome are many and difficult. Purity is chemically impossible. Impossible. How do you know that the "other stuff" in your vaccine is harmless? You don't!
But assume you have a pure feedstock, an uncontaminated production process and you just have to grow a bunch of virus, inactivate them so they do not cause the disease but still cause a good immune response. Virus need living cells to reproduce. Where do you get such cells? Here is the rub: any animal or human cell you use to allow viral replication will contain an unknown number of unidentified and identifiable virus and these will also be replicated and included in your vaccine! In short, you could give a monkey virus or ten to patients if you use monkey kidney cells to amplify a virus. It actually happens! Or you could give bird virus if you use chicken eggs. Same with pig tissue, human tissue, etc. The fact is that vaccines contain an unknown number of unwanted and unknown virus that may cause deadly diseases. They probably all do. Bacterial vaccines are not immune from this problem because they too are grown in such a way that alien virus contamination is likely. And, No, monkey virus infection will not make pull-ups easier. Some monkey virus kill humans within three days.
Now, if the above is not enough to shake your confidence in vaccines, consider the fact that the process of inactivation of virus is subject to the laws of chemistry if you use chemicals like formaldehyde to inactivate. You simply cannot inactivate 100% of the virus unless you are willing to destroy them utterly! That would leave you with a useless vaccine so you settle for leaving a few live and highly dangerous virus in your vaccine! Your government allows this - allows it. When you are shot with a vaccine, you have a chance of getting the very disease against which the darn stuff was supposed to protect you. Don't believe the propaganda about how "all the virus in this vaccine are dead" - you could end up dead too.
Several people are killed by vaccines every year, many more are wounded and some have lifelong disabilities as a result of vaccines. There is another very worrisome aspect to vaccination: stuff like mercury compounds added to the vaccine in order to keep them sterile. Nobody knows the long-term effects of these additives. Nobody knows the long-term effects of all those piggybacking virus in the vaccines. The range of diseases possibly caused by vaccines is long but serious candidates for vaccine-mediated diseases include autism, chronic encephalopathies, mental retardation, various seizure disorders, vision problems, Alzheimer's Disease, and a wide range of other neurological disorders for which we presently have not identified a causative agent.
Lastly, law shields vaccine manufacturers from law suits. If you are damaged by a vaccine, you have to go to a special federal court to seek compensation. Consider, is it sensible to use any product made by any manufacturer that is shielded by law from liability? That is an admission of doing something wrong! As for me, until I am reasonably certain that any vaccine offered to me is both safe and effective, I am not getting any more vaccinations!”
Comments
Post a Comment